Navigating Educational Changes

Written By Bellevue Team

Summary

The Trump administration's education proposals include efforts to close the Department of Education, shift control to states, and expand privatization through tax policies like the Educational Choice for Children Act. Linda McMahon, nominated as Education Secretary, brings federal experience that could shape these initiatives, though implementation may face significant challenges. Key areas of concern include potential funding cuts to critical programs such as Title I, II, III, and teacher loan forgiveness, as well as the rollback of DEI initiatives. Despite these risks, states like Pennsylvania have opportunities to strengthen local education systems through strategic leadership and targeted investments.

Key Takeaways

  • In line with his first-term promises, Trump has again proposed ending the Department of Education, signaling a potential shift toward state control. However, as evidenced during his first term, achieving this goal will likely prove challenging.

  • Linda McMahon's nomination as Education Secretary aligns with past Trump administration leadership choices and policy agendas. As a former Small Business Administration cabinet member, McMahon brings more experience navigating federal bureaucracy compared to other Trump nominees.

  • The administration, supported by a Republican-controlled Congress, will likely leverage tax policy to expand privatization efforts. This includes advancing the Educational Choice for Children Act, which offers tax credits for private school scholarships and Education Savings Accounts (ESAs).

  • Career and technical education, apprenticeships, the science of reading, and early childhood education could attract bipartisan investment due to their widespread appeal.

  • The administration may prioritize repealing Biden-era initiatives promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), likely through executive orders impacting federal agencies and contractors.

  • Key federal programs, such as Head Start, Title II (educator development), Title III (English learners), and Title I (low-income schools), may face reductions. Programs supporting teacher pipeline development and loan forgiveness could also be at risk.

Policy Considerations

  • Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) has introduced a bill to close the Department of Education and redistribute its responsibilities to other federal agencies. For instance, student loan programs could move to the Treasury, and civil rights enforcement could shift to the Justice Department. States may also receive block grants, granting them more flexibility in using federal education funds for public, private, or home schools. However, the bill's passage remains unlikely and serves primarily as a symbolic gesture.

  • The administration may issue an executive order rescinding federal DEI requirements, potentially conditioning federal funding to eliminate DEI-focused programming.

  • In 2018, there was a historic bipartisan increase in the Childcare and Development Block Grants (CCDBG). CCDBG funds support the state's childcare subsidies. The new Republican-controlled Congress's emphasis on job creation may make this a key area where it will increase funds.

  • Cuts to Title II (professional development for educators) and Title III (English language programs) could shift financial burdens to states. Additionally, efforts to transition funding for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) into block grants may gain traction, despite its traditional bipartisan support.

  • Federal efforts to curtail programs aimed at increasing teacher diversity or offering loan forgiveness for educators could negatively affect state and local teacher recruitment strategies. This is particularly concerning in Pennsylvania, which faces a severe teacher shortage.

  • Programs relying on federal grants, such as afterschool care and teacher training, could face funding cuts if discretionary funding is reduced. During Trump’s first term, he proposed cutting 21st Century Community Learning Centers grants that fund afterschool programs, though Congress rejected these cuts.

Impact on Pennsylvania and Philadelphia

    • Title I: Pennsylvania receives $172 million in Title I funding, crucial for low-income schools like those in Philadelphia. Cuts could strain programs for economically disadvantaged students and lead to legal challenges or state budget adjustments.

    • Title II: In 2023, Pennsylvania received $72 million to improve teacher quality and support professional development. A reduction in this funding could jeopardize programs that bolster the teacher pipeline and instructional quality.

    • Title III: Pennsylvania received $19 million in 2024 for English language learner programs. Cuts to this funding would force states to fill the gap or scale back services.

    • Childcare Development Block Grants: In 2024, PA received $268 million in CCDBG grants. The Trump administration's focus on increasing the workforce may result in more funding for childcare providers.   

  • Philadelphia’s efforts to recruit and retain teachers, particularly through loan forgiveness initiatives, could face setbacks if federal support for these programs is rescinded. This may impact the number of teachers applying for jobs and exacerbate an already pressing issue of teacher recruitment. 

  • Federal funding conditioned on eliminating DEI-related initiatives could disrupt education strategies in Philadelphia schools, which often prioritize equity and inclusion. 

  • While proposed changes present challenges, they also offer Pennsylvania an opportunity to assert greater control over its education system. With strong state leadership and Governor Shapiro's commitment to education funding, Pennsylvania can continue investing in programs like Title I and teacher development. These efforts will help ensure students and educators thrive despite federal policy shifts.

Contributors

Read More

Featured
The Federal Housing Crisis: Navigating Policy Shifts and State-Level Solutions
The Federal Housing Crisis: Navigating Policy Shifts and State-Level Solutions

The U.S. housing supply is at a breaking point, with seven million units needed to meet demand. While President Trump's proposed budget cuts and regulatory changes may impact federal housing programs, opportunities at the state and local levels remain critical. This post examines how Pennsylvania and Philadelphia are poised to address housing affordability and availability despite the shifting federal landscape.

Read More →
Appointee Update: February 5, 2025, Scott Turner
Appointee Update: February 5, 2025, Scott Turner
Read More →
Appointee Update: January 29, 2025, Russell Vought
Appointee Update: January 29, 2025, Russell Vought
Read More →
Bellevue Team
Previous

Appointee Update: Dec. 4, 2024
Next

Anticipating Changes: How Municipal Governments Can Navigate a Second Trump Administration