Navigating Healthcare Changes
Summary
Evolving federal healthcare policies, including potential changes to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act (ACA), present unique challenges and opportunities for Pennsylvania. While individuals—especially vulnerable populations—may face increased barriers to care, healthcare institutions and providers must navigate funding cuts and operational shifts. Balancing these competing pressures requires a targeted strategy to ensure equitable care access and institutional sustainability.
Key Takeaways
-
Affordable Care Act Modifications
Proposed changes to ACA funding could disproportionately affect Pennsylvanians relying on Pennie, the state’s health insurance marketplace. Should federal subsidies expire, middle-income families could see premium hikes of up to 21%, forcing many into financial precarity or loss of coverage altogether. This will be especially challenging for families ineligible for Medicaid yet unable to afford unsubsidized plans.
Telemedicine and Broadband Access
While telemedicine holds great promise for enhancing access, individuals in rural or underserved areas may lack the digital infrastructure or literacy needed to benefit from it. Closing the digital divide is vital to ensuring equitable telehealth access, especially for those with limited in-person care options.
-
Medicaid Funding Changes
A shift to Medicaid block grants risks reducing guaranteed federal contributions to Pennsylvania. Healthcare institutions—including hospitals, clinics, and community-based organizations—may face financial strain as they attempt to deliver services with fewer resources. Vulnerable populations, such as individuals with disabilities and seniors, could see program reductions as providers struggle to cover costs.
Changes to Employer-Sponsored Plans (403(b) Programs)
Cuts to programs like 403(b) tax-deferred plans could reduce benefits for healthcare workers employed by nonprofits and public institutions. This risks creating recruitment and retention challenges for healthcare providers, further straining the system’s ability to meet patient needs.
Opportunities for Bipartisan Collaboration
-
Strengthening Telemedicine Infrastructure
Investments in broadband expansion and digital literacy programs can ensure equitable telehealth access. Policymakers and healthcare organizations should work together to maximize federal programs like the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) initiative while tailoring local solutions for rural and underserved areas.Targeted Advocacy for ACA Subsidies
Nonprofits and healthcare advocates should push for continuing federal subsidies, leveraging data on how coverage reductions would impact middle-income families and increase uncompensated care burdens on hospitals. -
Value-Based Contracting
Expanding value-based care models through initiatives like the Bridges to Success: Keystones of Health allows institutions to align funding with outcomes. Pennsylvania can draw inspiration from both red and blue states:New York’s Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) program effectively reduced hospitalizations by integrating physical and behavioral health services and addressing social determinants of health (SDOH).
California’s Whole Person Care Pilots reduced healthcare costs while improving outcomes by focusing on housing and other SDOH for high-risk Medicaid enrollees.
Arkansas’s episode-based payment systems and Patient-Centered Medical Homes (PCMHs) streamlined care coordination and aligned financial incentives with outcomes.
Mitigating Workforce Challenges
Advocacy around preserving or reforming 403(b) plans to support healthcare workers is essential. Pennsylvania can also look to innovative approaches from red states:Tennessee’s TennCare III block grant program reinvested cost savings into health initiatives, maintaining provider resources despite fiscal constraints.
Oklahoma’s Rural Healthcare Access Initiative used targeted grants to expand telehealth and bolster rural provider networks, an idea Pennsylvania could adopt to address provider shortages in underserved areas.
Strategic Recommendations for Pennsylvania and Philadelphia
-
Proactively identify and support residents at risk of losing ACA coverage through strengthened partnerships with community organizations and healthcare navigators.
Develop tailored programs to boost digital literacy, ensuring telemedicine becomes an equitable solution rather than an added barrier.
-
Leverage Pennsylvania’s 1115 Medicaid Waiver as a model for combining value-based care with social determinants of health. Drawing on successes in states like New York, California, and Arkansas, Pennsylvania can advocate for expanded federal support while showcasing cost savings and improved outcomes.
Integrate lessons from Texas’s behavioral health initiatives, such as co-locating mental health and primary care services, to reduce stigma and improve access for high-risk populations.
Engage stakeholders to address provider workforce challenges, ensuring institutions maintain service levels despite financial pressures and changing employment benefits.
-
As Pennsylvania prepares for shifts in federal healthcare policy, distinguishing the impacts on individuals and institutions will be crucial. By learning from blue states like New York and California and red states like Arkansas, Tennessee, and Oklahoma, Pennsylvania can position itself as a leader in inclusive and innovative healthcare reform.
Targeted advocacy for equitable funding, innovative care models, and digital infrastructure improvements will ensure that the Commonwealth can meet the needs of its most vulnerable populations while supporting its healthcare institutions. By balancing the needs of patients and providers, Pennsylvania can emerge as a model for bipartisan healthcare solutions.
Contributors
Read More
